Peer Review Process

NADI Journal (Nyata Dedikasi Indonesia) implements a peer-review process to ensure the scientific quality, relevance, and practical contribution of each published article. The process is conducted in a double-blind manner, meaning both authors’ and reviewers’ identities are concealed to maintain objectivity and independence.

1. Submission Process

  • Authors submit manuscripts via the NADI Journal OJS system or official editorial email.

  • Editors conduct an initial screening to assess manuscript suitability with the journal’s focus and scope, as well as basic publication ethics standards.

2. Reviewer Assignment

  • Manuscripts passing the initial screening are sent to at least two expert reviewers in the relevant field.

  • Reviewers are selected based on expertise, experience, and impartiality.

3. Review Process

  • Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on:

    1. Originality and scientific/practical contribution

    2. Methodology and data accuracy

    3. Quality of analysis and interpretation

    4. Relevance to the journal’s scope

    5. Compliance with publication ethics

  • Reviewers provide comments, suggestions for improvement, and recommendations: accept, accept with revisions, reject, or needs additional review.

4. Manuscript Revision

  • Authors revise the manuscript according to reviewers’ suggestions and resubmit it for final evaluation.

  • Editors verify that revisions are sufficient before making a final decision.

5. Editorial Decision

  • Editors make the final decision based on reviewers’ recommendations and manuscript compliance with journal standards.

  • All communications are conducted professionally and confidentially.

6. Ethics and Confidentiality

  • Reviewers and editors must maintain manuscript confidentiality.

  • Any potential conflict of interest must be disclosed and avoided during the review process.